CO129-368 - Acting Governor May - 1910 [8-9] — Page 645

!

.I owacifor

YI

Solicitor mist well have known, and I was then, and still

strongly of opinion in which Mr. Justice Gompertz concurred

‚aroderi”) e'fazonsd-vONZOSTA

„VIGI,ređnorqə2.dcb8,"nofynol

ན།”

aqtoour oft onbeiwoados of wozor eft over! I

nottarmotat s not anib¬wwtot omitiu „Jal8 ore 20 rottel quoy to -movon eft grinedaininth. *ook**0 odd a'come!foox" alf to vyoo s bra at to tals to order to materopë dilt of dotaqeob aldmor

tarit duo batnioq doldw y£ut, .HJ8 hotsh yiqet slower brot to

to noutalouge aft blove oz ofum ferensy & as elderlcob now $1 -th add or quiwo soften toldo galeak as fazonon-ys/103JA wit

nood over gem fatona"-"onro÷ZA Bit 979w gateits zeitlosit- gnimoo redden a пo mwozo add gnfalvbo at yinvolvong boпoonoo .estrant tokio na gnitoa norw mid enoted

.S

ode šade aindua of ylluteɔoquor ortash I giqqa som blwoda e3522 to Tiaretoo2 ods to moltoidaat botħilaup nide mi InTomo"-"ontoJSA to noteloog odd blor! I es saof on orit tant tellod bos bonš¬wana Llu% odt déiw etes aruso ? .gnofoD ni gnisɔa Lazonod-x6m70**A edt to beymeado orrediksi moters BAW elɗ .ot hertechs er blow soltech Polno off to sonceda edt TİP 870289neborg arathoreth ow? yi to ocao edr al os vialatuso

that in the circumstances as the Crown had obtained an authorita-

-tive decision in its favour in the later case on the same

question that it should not have attempted to pursue further

641 the appeal in the former case.

4.

Holding this view I need scarcely say that

if I had been at the time in my substantive office of Attorney-

-General I should certainly have declined to sanction what I

regarded as the ill advised action of the Crown Solicitor. I

may observe in regard to His Excellency's observation as to the

very inconvenåent situation created owing "to the two contra-

-dictory judgments" that that position would not have been in

the least altered had we given two judgments on the same point

instead of one.

5.

I only desire to add that in Sir William

Goodman's case who I believe acted on several occasions as

Chief Justice and was afterwards appointed to the substantive

post questions must doubtless have arisen of a similar

character but I have not heard that they were regarded as &

stumbling block to the practical discharge of his duties or

that the position in his case was over assailed.

I have etc.,

(sd.) W. Rees „avies.

HOLA BELKojoa ung 21M ATTTTVN gooqua*

-Tobrar I bas yonoflao nil of mexoqa oved I

Jon hole nottountant ods tart motantndun VI secTobal of busto-

.tiepy to scro arté að viqqa have vas at

b.it has na” A au to ocno offe abrisnot £À

.C

I dareqash a'youn!feox! allt to a bre A afganger ng nt edzalier s to ILE odt at novig thaeria bort I ca Jane veo of ven * mà ažnoa to notrasup Zustänu omne ods no normbut borobiaron nointaob roditona novih ovad of,Inubiribmt omen out to ones

120 20 tarit galarovoz to onoqrug boltiosqa oft mo* Jqu9x9 vorh add valwoƐ .-? na sorat a need ever blwow **ong14 alone~!

Torokfo

The Honourable

The Colonial Secretary,